Great barrington declaration verification#
Great barrington declaration professional#

I am fully Pfizer vaxxed, boosted, Sanofi-Pasteur flu boosted, and also I wear my mask when inside other places away from home. Getting back to Taylor’s letter, the general content is, as in a prior letter by her, more about being anti-goverment than “what is the optimum response to the COVID pandemic.” Getting back to the two other letters by Sarabeth Matilsky and Michele Baranow, I have no magic, guaranteed, or warranted answers. So, now we have one of our two feet going out of the science bucket and into the politics bucket.

Bhattacharya - a major contributor to the GBD website - was also alleged to have been a research fellow at the conservative Hoover Institution. That article also alleged that GBD was said to be promoted by the libertarian American Institute of Economic Research, and Dr. Before you wave your victory flag because of the GBD website, read the article at the sciencebasedmedicine website. One link from the list of critics took me to the article titled, “JAMA promotes the false equivalence of ‘focused protection ’.” This was on the website and I read all of it. The Guardian cited Sky News as doing the name check but I could not find when I visited the GBD website any signatory names other than the main guys. Johnny Bananas,’” at The Guardian website. 9, 2020, titled “Herd immunity letter signed by fake experts including, eg.

Great barrington declaration professional#

Wikipedia also has an entry for “Great Barrington Declaration” and it also criticises the declaration, as well as discusses and names more of the fake names on the signatory list and points out that many had listed professional jobs far distant from medical areas.Ī search on the string “factcheck great barrington declaration” brought up links to many articles that were critical of, listed shortcomings of, and told counter-stories about the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD).

Great barrington declaration verification#

Robots and pranksters could have entered many names, too, since the signup at the website could be done without verification of signer’s identity (I know of other cases where this has happened). This number is contradicted by many other polls I have seen that said the majority of providers are “for” almost all anti-COVID strategies (exceptions: untested, rumor-based suggestions from social networks and quacks). The “signing” of the declaration by more than “850,000 medical and public health scientists” seems a stretch since the graphic implies some 90 percent of signatories are in the USA, and that amounts to basically almost every provider that is out there. Basically, the main authors are clearly not anti-vaccine or anti-mask (by word search), but they are pro-“focused protection” and anti-mandate and anti-lockdown.

2 letter challenged me and readers to look at – and fact-check – the Great Barrington Declaration (at ).